a. The name, address, phone number and authorized signature on behalf of the applicant;

b. If the proposed site or structure is not owned by the city, the name, address and phone number of the owner and a signed document or lease confirming that the applicant has the owner’s permission to apply for permits to construct the macro facility on the proposed site or structure;

c. A statement identifying the nature and operation of the macro facility;

d. A vicinity sketch showing the relationship of the proposed use to existing streets, structures and surrounding land uses, and the location of any nearby bodies of water, wetlands, critical areas or other significant natural or manmade features;

e. Construction drawings as well as a plan of the proposed use showing proposed streets, structures, land uses, open spaces, parking areas, fencing, pedestrian paths and trails, buffers, and landscaping, along with text identifying the proposed use(s) of each structure or area included on the plan;

f. Photo simulations of the proposed macro facility from public rights-of-way, public properties and affected residentially zoned properties. Photo simulations must include all cable, conduit and/or ground-mounted equipment necessary for and intended for use in the deployment regardless of whether the additional facilities are to be constructed by a third party;

g. A sworn affidavit signed by an RF engineer with knowledge of the proposed project affirming that the macro facility will be compliant with all FCC and other governmental regulations in connection with human exposure to radio frequency emissions for every frequency at which the facility will operate. If facilities which generate RF radiation necessary to the macro facility are to be provided by a third party, then the permit shall be conditioned on an RF certification showing the cumulative impact of the RF emissions on the entire installation;

h. Information necessary to demonstrate the applicant’s compliance with FCC rules, regulations and requirements which are applicable to the proposed macro facility;

i. If not proposing a collocation, then sufficient documentation showing that the applicant has made a reasonable attempt to find a collocation site acceptable to engineering standards and that collocating was not feasible or that it posed a physical problem;

j. If proposing to locate in a residential zone, evidence demonstrating that the proposed facility cannot be located outside the residential zone;

k. Evidence demonstrating compliance with applicable provisions of Chapter 22.54 MMC, Airport Compatibility, to demonstrate that the proposed WCF is not located within the airport’s restricted airspace;

l. Information sufficient to establish compliance with MMC 22.62.070 and MMC 22.62.080;

m. Current city of Monroe business licenses and insurance requirements, as listed in MMC Title 5, Business Regulations; and

n. Such additional information as deemed necessary by the director for proper review of the application, and which is sufficient to enable the director to make a fully informed decision pursuant to the requirements of this chapter.